main

Tag Archives | NPWS

Topographic Maps of NSW 2022 Series

Please note that Bob Sneddon is the sole author of this article.

Topographic Maps of NSW 2022 Series by Bob Snedden

The defining feature of topographic maps are the presentation of the form of the landscape topography via the contour lines. Along with this are the vertical and horizontal grid coordinates for the “Grid References” and “GPS positioning”. The current 2022 Series fail to do this, rendering the maps unfit for purpose and therefore presenting something of a risk to the user. Those who rely on accurate landform information e.g. Rural Fire Service, NSW NPWS and bushwalkers will be directly affected. After examining 20 maps in the 2022 series covering the south coast region, from one outlet all were found to be similarly deficient.

In recent years the need to review the cost of paper map production has led the mapping authority i.e. “Spatial Services” away from the use of traditional lithographic printing. Map production is now outsourced and print production is via the use of laser digital print process. There has also been a departure from pre final run proofing and quality control. The usual casualty of department restructure has been a significant loss of intellectual content. As often happens, a renewal of a departments intellect does not mean and automatic continuity of policy. On the technical side, there is today an assumption that what you see on the computer screen is what will appear on paper. This is Not necessarily the case.

As part of the stream lining of map production, map reprinting is also subject to an “Auto generation” process whereby a reprint is initiated automatically, evidently governed by “barcode” stock records.

The deficiencies with the current 2022 series lies with the preparation of the original computer file provided to the printer. Although the contour lines and grid reference lines appear on the digital version, as seen on the computer screen. This is not what occurs with the laser printed paper copy. The defining map features are there, but virtually indistinguishable.

It is not a new problem for anyone familiar with printing processes. It just reflects the current trend of a departure from traditional approach to quality control. In short there needs to be attention given to the combination of colour selection, printing process and print stock i.e. the actual hard copy paper.

After protracted discussion issues regarding place names I have been advised:

“Spatial Services is still running an old auto generated PDF series which doesn’t include any of the updates you had suggested over the years. Business priorities have led us in different directions and whilst it remains an aspiration to produce, I can’t put a timeframe on when that might happen. Further, the circumstances remain the same in that an auto gen product doesn’t deliver the same level of information and annotation as the old traditionally produced map series”.

Errors in books, are often set aside as “typo’s”. With maps it is more than that. Where topographical information i.e. contours lines cannot be clearly distinguished and place names are incorrect, (an ongoing problem), it becomes a serious matter, critical to public safety. There is an assumption and indeed an expectation maps will be correct. The absence of critical topographic information renders the maps useless for field navigation. In the case of areas of known risk such as the southern part of Morton National Park where it surrounds the former Tianjara Artillery Training Area. The poor presentation of topographical information impacts on the management of use patterns, safety and duty of care, and can include the operation of other stakeholder activities.

Both the printer and “Spatial Services” have been advised of the deficiencies with the current series 2022 maps. Spatial Services where the files originate have stated (as above), they are aware but have no plans to correct the issue in the immediate future. It is unfortunate that “BUSINESS PRIORITIES have overtaken safety concerns and for the Government agency to be producing a product that is unfit for sale is unacceptable. Spatial Services claim they undertake appropriate proofing and quality control measures but this is clearly contradicted if one compares the 2017 and 2022 series.

A recent practice by some, is to download the map and print off the relevant section of interest. Some venture to say you can massage the file, but this requires a degree of skill using special graphic software to enhance to contours etc.

In my own view scrolling around with a computer in the field can be impractical and just grabbing a relevant section of the map does not adequately replace the spread of the full map especially when the overall terrain is unfamiliar.

All these opportunities are possible and will be argued by some. None the less, it remains the current 2022 series of maps are unfit for purpose and should not be on sale, and the “Autogen” process for restocking should be abandoned and the maps withdrawn from sale until there is a decision to correct them.

Stakeholder groups and their members e.g. Bushwalking NSW, conservation group and Rural Fire Service are encouraged to express their concern to the map publisher NSW Department of Customer Service -Spatial Services.

Bob Snedden –
Bawley Point NSW 2539
9th September 2024

 

Light to Light Walk, Ben Boyd National Park

Ben Boyd NP - Andrew Connor

Ben Boyd NP – Andrew ConnorLight to Light Walk, Ben Boyd National Park

Light to Light Walk, Ben Boyd National Park

In 2019 the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) exhibited a draft Light to Light Walk Strategy along with amendments to the Ben Boyd NP Plan of Management. The draft Strategy proposed a signature multi-day coastal walk, transforming the existing campground walk experience with hut to hut and lighthouse style accommodation in addition to new walk-in campgrounds. There were also proposed realignments to the existing track. As well as forcing independent walkers and others into formal campgrounds, the draft Strategy also proposed the prohibition of bush camping along the walking route.

The public exhibition attracted over 200 submissions, including from Bushwalking NSW Inc and bushwalking clubs. NPWS has now released the final Strategy and Plan of Management Amendments along with a report on submissions made and responses. These documents can be accessed here.

The final Strategy delivers much of what was proposed in the draft, although changes have been made to address some of the concerns raised during the exhibition period.

Bush camping will be allowed at Mowarry Point although it is unclear if the existing area will need expansion over time. NPWS will not co-locate independent camping with accommodation at Hegartys Bay. Independent camping will be relocated from Hegartys Bay to purpose built walk-in only sites at Bittangabee Bay. A separate group camping area will also be developed at Bittangabee Bay. Given the new facilities proposed at Mowarry Point, NPWS will no longer construct purpose built walk-in only campsites at Saltwater Creek. Two new hut accommodation sites at Mowarry Point and Hegartys Bay are proposed to cater for a maximum of 36 walkers per night. The existing accommodation at Green Cape Lightstation will be reconfigured to accommodate 36 walkers.

The Strategy confirms that the new accommodation will be managed by NPWS rather than a commercial operator.

The proposed walk has been awarded $7.9 million funding by the Regional Growth – Environment and Tourism Fund program, an initiative of the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment. Subject to approvals, work on the first stage was expected to commence in late 2021 and be completed in late 2022. Before work commenced, a Review of Environmental Factors was released for public comment.

To assist with the implementation of the Strategy, NPWS will be establishing a Light to Light Walk Stakeholder Reference Group. It is hoped that this group will include representation from the bushwalking community.

Review of Environmental Factors Released for Public Comment

NPWS has also released a Review of Environmental Factors (REF) to inform the proposed upgrades to the Light to Light Walk. The REF is open for consultation until 15 October 2021. BNSW Inc will be making a submission on the REF and affiliated clubs are encourage to do likewise. The REF and accompanying documentation can be found here.